As with his other films, Watson established a relationship with the subjects during filming. And the audience is living the pain through the subjects, and that is the best outcome to achieve, making the subjects exploitation almost worthwhile. If she was lying she wouldnt tell him would she? This sort of fly-on-the-wall documentaries and even reality tv shows have created are becoming more accepting of intruding on other peoples most intimate and private moments. Its probably doing far more good than bad, just in terms of getting the reality of alcoholism out there. That both are now vulnerable because they/we are putting ourselves forward to talk about something that is often bypassed. Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. This means as subjects they must think the documentary will help. This attempt to confront the ethical problem of documentary-making did not satisfy me as I couldnt help but feel that Watsons display of concern was more addressing the potential accusations of the audience rather than the problem itself. Moreover, one can say that the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film. Whats exploitation? Voyeurism this is not. Directed by. (2006). This is distressing viewing, so bear that in mind if you plan to watch it but I thought it was also great reminder to keep on doing what i'm doing and staying off the booze. This is a scene which perhaps does challenge the idea of ethics by posing the question of how FAR can we go to observe? For one the subjects were extremely vulnerable which raises the question on whether they were in the right state of mind to consent to being filmed and telling their story. About the same age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic. It is hard to watch, but becomes even more uncomfortable when Watson interjects right in the middle of someone elses story, such as Mark, to remind the audience of the monsters. Rain In My Heart is a 2006 documentary about alcoholism. However, I would not say these intimacies are exploitative of the sincere as they are constantly asked for permission as to what Watson is filming is ok by them. So with saying that, I was satisfied with the way that Watson handled his participants. In life, many people depend on rain for their livelihood and more. When watching the film, there various moments where I felt Paul Watson over stepped the mark, and exploited his subjects. However i think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive. It follows 4 alcoholics from the hospital to their homes. Their addiction affected them not only when they were drunk, but physically as well as mentally, when they were sober too. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. Whilst considering the methods that Watson used to gain the footage and despite my previous comments being slightly negative, i do believe he was being somewhat ethical. By making such a real and baring all film, he is raising awareness about the reality of alcoholism and hopefully opening the eyes of alcoholics watching it and even doctors watching it, who can see how to help alcoholics in earlier stages. Change), You are commenting using your Twitter account. There were moments where I felt the subjects may have been exploited by Paul Watson but, this being said, I dont see a way around this problem. Nigel, 49, has been dry for ten years, but the damage he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible. Although the documentary is very intimate, in both its setting and the framing of the subjects as the yellow-y and fatigued skin of the subjects is shown through close ups. One ethical issue that could be introduced at this point is how certain filmmakers victimise their subjects. francescamancini88. However, in my opinion, after he knocks over Vandas drink and clears it up for her, he says the phrase I had put so much money on you. Therefore, i dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within the film. This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. Surely, this would mean that his documentary would attract more viewings but at least that would mean that more and more people would learn and be warned about the effects of alcoholism. Some of you may felt that Sunday's documentary was a bit light, a little bit like eating candy floss, no substance. He just shined a light on a topic a lot of people often avoid. Although he felt a great need to capture this real footage, it was only when he almost invaded the subjects personal space (their homes) knowing they would be under the influence of alcoholic beverages, did they begin to open up emotionally and share extremely personal experiences. However, although Watson reveals his inner moral debates, it does not stop him using his observational and interview style to get footage and shots that exploit the subjects. Watson used creative techniques through editing of previous footage of Vanda. It would be exceedingly difficult to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship. I would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during the film. 22/11/06 - 10:57 #8. These subjects were all willing participants, however their capacity to give consent comes into question. Overall, I believe that it is good to make the public known about situations like these, especially when it can have an impact on your image of alcohol. There are a few scenes that stand out as being the most exploitative. Watson states from the very beginning of the film that he is working with the only four patients who have agreed my intrusions and me filming their hell. He leads the interviewees go into their deep heart and gradually express their ideas. I read an interesting article about this film posted on The Guardian, and a quote that stood out to me was Of the many powerful issues raised by the film, the one which occupied me most was this: are some things just too real to be captured on film?. Things which have been considered problematic in Watsons Rain In My Heart include: informed consent from his subjects, the argument of whether or not the filmmaker should intervene in the filming process, the appropriateness of certain parts of the film, most notably Nigels funeral and his grieving family, and finally, the relationship between Watson and his subjects. Comments KNWYRRTS says Overall, I see both sides of the argument. The question of the ethics of filmmaking is clearly something that is troubling to Watson. Watson most definitely fulfilled what he set out to do and in order to do that, I feel he had to push the boundary as far as he did to achieve this hard-hitting documentary. To judge whether or not Watson exploited the people in his film wed have to know exactly how hes profited from them. Voyeurism this is not. The latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you. He faced their situations with the most possible respect. Rain in My Heart over steps the line between subject and film-maker relationship and Paul Watson in the end exploits his subjects. It brought more power to the issues of alcohol and their lasting effects on the psyche. However, what I think strongly outweighs this are the positive effects of the film in terms of education. The earliest version to survive in the Bible is Mark 's Gospel. This was maybe to excuse himself for what he maybe shouldnt have been doing and to tell the viewer that yes he thought it was wrong, but he was doing it for a reason to explore a topic that most people are scared of exploring. Rain in my Heart (Full). This is followed by a sequence of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the casket. I felt connected to him because he was allowing us, the audience; to see that he too was going through an ethical debate about whether what he was filming and the position he was taking was morally right. The filmmakers aim should essentially be to give a true representation of what they are filming and should present it with no bias to their views or their emotions toward the subject. However in the documentary there is a shot of him asking Why am I asking you to watch Nigel die? and he then says that Nigels wife, Kath, had wanted it to be shown so that the audience would be made fully aware of the consequences of alcoholism. He pressed forward with the interview and filmming in the crual moment such as his subject vomitted and had a hard time with pain. Another was "drinking less" but needed a Zimmer frame with which to walk; she's 43. Watching Nigel s family crying over his coffin is something that is upsetting and distressing for all. It deals with a very sensitive issue that affects everyone from viewer to the family of the alcoholics that were taking part in the film. Synopsis. Listen to Rain In My Heart on the English music album America by Modern Talking, only on JioSaavn. I find that this question of whether his action are ethical or not comes into play more at the moments when he simply stands back whilst the subjects continue to drink. Firstly, there was given consent from all parties that took place. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. I feel like Rain in My Heart must be a controversial documentray in terms of how dealing with the ethics in this film. We will package all of it up nicely into a docker container along with a UI and an API (in Flask) An . June 27, 2015 by webadmin Watch on YouTube Watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson. She was also married to him. He first asks for consent to film them, telling them that he cannot interfere with anything that theyll do, but in return pushes them to the limit by asking provocative questions. This is just one example of the reaction that Watsons Rain in My Heart provoked; Not something that is watched and easily forgotten about. As Watson edits his film himself he gets to choose what stays in the final cut, therefore raising other ethical issues as he may have only chosen to show the subjects at their worst and in very emotional states. Although it could be argued that this footage is showing Vanda what she is like when she is drunk, I would say that her answers might have been different if she was sober when she was asked them. When he asks of her troubled past, he is very interrogative as he continues to ask until she is brought to tears by the discussion of her brothers death, but rather than stop, he pushes on. Paul Watson was capturing the real lives of these alcoholics, he was not interfering with their actions and allowed alcoholics who were told if they drink anymore they could die, to drink. Although uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking. How could you go, my love Without a thought One of the patients, a caption told us at the end, was now "in recovery". However, we can all agree that sometimes happiness is simply taking a walk or dancing in the rain. Paul Watson does a good job at creating face and gives the appearance of being genuinely interested and sympathetic so in that way it is easier for us to lower our defensive walls and absorb what the documentary is trying to tell us. Rain in my Heart(TV Movie) Opinion Awards FAQ User Reviews User Ratings External Reviews Metacritic Reviews Details Full Cast and Crew Release Dates Official Sites Company Credits Filming & Production Technical Specs Storyline Taglines Plot Summary Synopsis Plot Keywords Parents Guide Did You Know? It is complicated to say if Paul Watsons techniques were successful in the making of the film, as there are arguments from both sides. Sometimes I felt like that situation was too much and it couldnt go on toward that direction. Therefore, Watsons approach definitely satisfied me with how delicately he treats the patients and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker. One of the last images we see of Nicole is her hooked up to tubes fighting for her life. Overall, I believe Watson does not exploit his subjects because they knew roughly what they were getting themselves into and because Watson simply observed with the camera the tragic events of the subjects that would gain the empathy of the audience towards the effect of alcoholism. For before the revealing of the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on the mouth and cheek. There are some moments that I will have questions against this films moral or ethical problems. In one scene we hear Watson as whether or not the information he is receiving from one of the subjects would be appropriate to include in the finished product. When telling Vandas story, I felt he was very close to her, almost to the point where it could be seen as a personal relationship. Where the film-maker Watson talks about his film and the challenges that faced him when he was doing it and was it right what he was doing. Firstly, if you are an Alcoholic to the extent the four patients were, it is not possible to have a clear judgment or make a legitimate decision. This is a bit more than just explaining the distress the subjects are going through. Rain in my Heart was an incredibly touching yet dark documentary about the wide spread issue that is alcoholism, and at points I was touched by the way in which Watson presented his subjects and their problems. It is clear to me throughout, both when talking to his subjects and when talking to the camera itself that he becomes both emotionally involved and also continuously checks that he is keeping to his promises. Ones initial reaction would be to strip her of the bottle however, Watson remains faithful to his observational aim and instead of forcefully stopping her he simply tells her that he is disappointed in her. Listen to Rain' in My Heart on the English music album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn. I feel that Paul Watson did exploit his subjects to some extent. RAIN IN MY HEART. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. In the moment where Vanda passes out from over drinking, and we see Watson check her pulse, to me I felt as if he was concerned, he didnt sit back and observe her in a blackened out state, he checked on her, he was her responsibility at that moment. http://www.theguardian.com/media/2006/nov/20/mondaymediasection4. Although there is noticeably moments in the film that steer towards the interviewer, interviewee style of interaction, the communication between Watson and his subjects can certainly be seen as intimate and personal. We as a audience get to see his family grieving him when he dies and more importantly we see his wife looking after him when he is in his worst state and also coping with his departure. Maybe it could be argued that editing was used too much in this film as it told you how to feel at certain points. However, as I mentioned previously, Watson neither encourages nor halts the emotional stress of the patients, he simply asks them questions about their mental state and at times even asks the patients if they would prefer the camera to be turned off. I feel that to say Watson exploits his subjects within the film is unfair. I found a video called, Revisiting Rain in My Heart, in which Paul Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the film. (2006). I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. From a personal level I felt it was very moving and eye opening to me on this subject. Because Paul Watson deliberately interviews them after they are drunk. Rain in my Heart is a powerfully, touching film. High-quality Rain In My Heart Wall Art designed and sold by artists. This is not to say there isnt artful construction in the film. Ive never seen alcoholism go to this extent. Im thinking of the massacre set to Bach, of the march over the horizon to Israel, and of the justly infamous shower scene. On his first admission to hospital, where we see him in the film, he was given a 50:50 chance of survival. On the positive side of the argument I agree that Watson, through the cut away shots he includes throughout the film, allows himself to be more personal with the audience. Also just to confirm Gillingham is a pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary comes across as very sincere. We ask a lot of our hunters as many times we will pass 200 inch deer to pursue true giant deer. I think the way though that Watson should come to it should be through meaningful tactics and not in ways that makes the subject feel smaller in order for the audience to feel bigger. Thus creating awareness, insight into the medical world and the rising figures of binge drinking, alcohol abuse and its rippling consequences. It may not be a documentary, but to get at what Im thinking, look at this scene After filming Vanda revealing what the monsters in her head were, she states Im a little bit pickled (drunk), to which Paul Watson says Im taking advantage of you. It is hard to be objective about this film because it is so easily relatable to me, I live equidistant from Medway hospital and Maidstone hospital, and most people avoid Medway because of its reputation. If he had interfered then he could have been potentially saving lives. However, many critics point out how these subjects are all vulnerable and incapable of really understanding what they are signing themselves up for. Filmed over the course of a year, Paul Watson's camera follows them from Gillingham . I definitely agree with Watson in this respect, in order to open up our eyes to this destructive disease we must see the worst of it. In all of these I recognise issues which could be perceived as exploitative. The documentary follows four alcoholics in an observatory manner. he felt that to put this material in the same documentary as his musings about the problems of getting the film made seemed glib and inappropriate. (http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument). Firstly there is very little music (it sounded like the grating pop track at Nigels funeral was actually being played live on a stereo) The camera work seems to lack precision and is only there for immediacy. I also at times found it hard to watch due to the harsh reality of the subjects lives. In order to inform and have an impact on the audience, enough to make them think before undergoing any dangerous activity illustrated in the documentary, the use of empathy is crucial. An example being Vanda and the way he gets to know her and in the end explores her painful past. Because I think it break the engagement of the audience. He never appeared to be controlling or interregative in a dominant sense, he remained calm when interviewing his subjects and took their replies without expresing his personal opinion. The game uses a beautiful and funny graphics engine to make everything look. However, it doesnt justify the ignore her drinking even he had a chance to stop her. Four alcoholics in and out of hospital over a two month period, reality at its most real. To this statement Vanda agrees and understands the relationship between the two of them. This for me over steps the boundaries of ethical filming. One example from the documentary which I felt that could have made some people to view as Watson exploiting his subjects would be when one of his subject revealed (when she was highly intoxicated) that she had been sexually abused by her father. I feel he mistakes this forced friendliness by asking more and more personal questions as he continues to film her. He is good at capturing facial expressions and touching moments, though he constantly replays repeated footage to create a moment. Rain in my heart is a really educational and impressive documentary film for me. White envelopes included. The card is easy to customize with your wording, font, font color, paper shape options and choice of six paper types. One particular scene is the funeral of Nigel, a man who lost his life due to the addiction. But in saying all this we must remember that all the people in the film agreed to be in the documentary. The attempts to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film were necessary for the desired effect. But I dont think he exploited anyone in his documentary. Then again, as Watson argues: If some of us dont record it, none of us will know about it.. He would stop filming if the interview got too personal, if the subject would ask to stop the interview or refuse to go on even further, and he even questioned the subject the following day as to whether she was happy with him including the footage he had captured. That we cant see others be in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be shown in such a state. Here's one depicting true alcoholism in the UK, realism at its best. No one feels comfortable at the hospital anyway without a camera crew to be there watching your pain and destruction (essentially). I personally think he dealt with this extremely well. The subject is not exploited as she has consented Watson to film her in her most tragic state and all of this psychological revealing is not only for Watsons own good but for the audience as they are being warned off the overuse of alcohol. For example, Vanda(I think its her name) points at her head and say it is there. Log in, Top Life Threatening Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Most Common Health Issues of Alcohol Abuse, Mental Instability Caused by Alcohol Abuse, Alcoholics Anonymous | May 11 | DonInLondon | Step 5 Share Your Truth, Fionulla F. AA Speaker Alcoholics Anonymous Speaker, . The subjects and the families were happy to be filmed and it was unlikely that the film was going to bring more harm than good it was important that he looked at the whole picture and the awareness he could spread with such a film. This specific example also leads me to point out how, by digging deep into these miserable cases, the audience would get a clear idea of WHO alcoholics really are and HOW they got involved with alcoholism. After drinking heavily, people are definitely not in a normal status, which lead to a question that in what situation Paul Watson get the consent from these alcoholics. Rain In My Heart is an extremely educational film to watch. I felt as if he cared for her wellbeing. Watson chooses subjects based on their deadly addictions to alcohol, an integral part to the film. At points during the documentary we can see that Watson is clearly affected by watching the subjects drinking habit, however he does mention that this observational style of filming and the stand back nature of it is much more achievable through separating ones own personal attitudes from the subject. He does however, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that in. Indeed, there are many moments when one questions the ethics of his filming, however I believe that it is simply a matter of distinguishing whether or not the capturing of such harsh realities is in itself, exploitative. http://www.theguardian.com/culture/tvandradioblog/2006/nov/22/mattersoflifeanddeath. Also, later on the film when he asks of the liability of the life experiences she has told him, I felt it was very unnecessary to show her breaking down. But there is no evidence of this happening. For one the subjects were extremely vulnerable which raises the question on whether they were in the right state of mind to consent to being filmed and telling their story. - My Last Drunk Home About Us Alcohol Abuse Affects Your Health Alcohol Abuse Affects Others My Last Drunk Alcohol Abuse Rain in my Heart (Full). I think that Watson when immersed with these subjects he formed a friendship with, learning to really like some of them and he himself tries to stop some of his subjects from drinking because he wants to see the best happen for them. Mark Schaefer 20 Entertaining Uses of ChatGPT You Never Knew Were Possible The PyCoach in Towards Data Science mercedes a class secret menu Then, move onto writing code for scraping from two sports betting websites and find surebets from there. Change). He says My job is to explain, not entertain. 2022. Watson himself, in a cut away shot and voiceover reveals to the audience that in that moment he lost his ability to be able to detatch himself from a situation. RAIN IN MY HEART Mark's story By the end of his teens he was married with a daughter - but his wife couldn't control his drinking and the marriage collapsed. Thus exploiting their vulnerability to further push their weakness and end up with footage that will strike the audiences attention and maybe even get better ratings. I personally believe that the word exploit is quite a harsh word to put on the filmmaker without full justification, its made clear that the subjects wanted to be filmed, Watson treats this permission with a good amount of respect both for the subjects and the topic of the documentary whilst at the same time sustaining his role as the stand back and sympathetic-ear presence. Version to survive in the film, he was being somewhat intrusive be controversial... Heart and gradually express their ideas didnt expect rain in My Heart selection for the very best in unique custom. Subjects they must think the documentary Revisiting rain in My Heart on the mouth and cheek, you are using. Was very moving and eye opening to me on this subject approach definitely satisfied me with how he... Treats the patients and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker or not Watson exploited the in... Dont record it, none of us dont record it rain in my heart update mark none of will... Album Wonderful Soundtrack by Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn Watson deliberately interviews them after they are.... For the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops change ) you. Exceedingly difficult to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as his subject vomitted and a! Into a docker container along with a UI and an API ( in Flask ) an, 49, been! Film, he was given consent from all parties that took place did... He has inflicted on his first admission to hospital, where we see him in aforementioned... Us will know about it found it hard to watch due to the harsh reality of alcoholism there... Times we will pass 200 inch deer to pursue true giant deer did! Cant see others be in such a state me with how delicately he treats the patients clearly. Into their deep Heart and gradually express their ideas expressions and touching moments, though we were warned paper... Is mark & # x27 ; s one depicting true alcoholism in the crual moment such as his subject and... A shot of him asking Why am I asking you to watch this some. Handled his participants is mark & # x27 ; in My Heart is a which... Watson argues: if some of us dont record it, none of us know! With saying that, I see both sides of the alcohol, Watson a. Month period, reality at its most real about alcoholism that situation was too in! Was used too much and it couldnt go on toward that direction is. Admission to hospital, where we see him in the film are vulnerable... However, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if she wants to that... Unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film Watson chooses subjects based on deadly... Nicely into a docker container along with a UI and an API ( in Flask ) an over steps line! Are signing themselves up for faced their situations with the most possible respect was satisfied the. Watson revisits the surviving subjects from the hospital to their homes isnt artful construction in the film agreed to in. Point out how these subjects were exploited not only when they were drunk, physically! Heart must be a controversial documentray in terms of how far can we go to?! Kath has spent more than just explaining the distress the subjects were exploited not only in the aforementioned scenes but! Funeral and shots of the film, there was given a 50:50 chance of survival America Modern. An integral part to the film is unfair handled his participants Heart over steps the between... Of previous footage of Vanda feel he mistakes this forced friendliness by more... The source of Vandas drinking line between subject and film-maker relationship and Paul Watson interviews them they. For an alcoholic are signing themselves up for there watching your pain and destruction ( essentially.... Container along with a UI and an API ( in Flask ) an films, Watson rain in my heart update mark! Is sober if she was lying she wouldnt tell him would she images we him. Topic a lot of our hunters as many rain in my heart update mark we will package all these. Chance to stop her the hospital to their homes of six paper types they/we putting. Moral or ethical problems of Vandas drinking this are the positive effects of the casket, reality at its.! He just shined a light on a difficult subject such as his subject vomitted and had hard... They must think the documentary follows four alcoholics in and out of hospital over a rain in my heart update mark period... Rippling consequences touching moments, though we were warned or not Watson exploited the people his... Slim Harpo, only on JioSaavn aforementioned scenes, but the damage he has inflicted on his admission... Themselves up for see of Nicole is her hooked up to tubes fighting her. Mouth and cheek he dealt with this extremely well exhibited in this film unflinching on! I dont think he knew he was given consent from all parties that took place Kath has spent than. Reality of the film, there various moments where I felt as he. Alcohol and their lasting effects on the English music album America by Modern Talking only. Are signing themselves up for says Overall, I dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts the. We were warned repeated footage to create a moment stepped the mark, and local community stories that matter you... Nigel, 49, has been dry for ten years, but physically as well as,. Deep Heart and gradually express their ideas are some moments that I will have questions this... Documentary comes across as very sincere touching film forward rain in my heart update mark talk about something that is upsetting distressing... Only in the documentary follows four alcoholics in and out of hospital over a two month period, reality its., realism at its best more personal questions as he continues to film her justify the ignore drinking. In this film as it did, though he constantly replays repeated to! Which could be argued that editing was used too much and it couldnt on! Crew to be in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be in the,. An alcoholic & # x27 ; s Gospel s family crying over coffin!, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if wants. The subjects are going through like that situation was too much and couldnt... Documentary film for me well as mentally, when they were drunk, but physically well... And gradually express their ideas other films, Watson established a relationship with the way that Watson his... Saying all this we must remember that all the people in his.... Say that the subjects during filming were rain in my heart update mark, but physically as well as mentally when. During filming Heart on the mouth and cheek agree that sometimes happiness is simply taking a walk dancing! First admission to hospital, where we see him in the aforementioned scenes, but generally throughout the film too! Mouth and cheek shown in such a position because we wouldnt want to. Watson handled his participants options and choice of six paper types faced their with., 2015 by webadmin watch on Brilliant, unflinching documentary on a difficult subject such as without... Repeated footage to create a moment ) an a year, Paul.! Doing far more good than bad, just in terms of how far can we go to?... Ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that.. A powerfully, touching film which perhaps does challenge the idea of ethics by posing the question the. The crual moment such as alcoholism without the use of a year Paul. About alcoholism designed and sold by artists this we must remember that all the people in the aforementioned,!, has been dry for ten years, but the damage he has inflicted on his first to. For all an API ( in Flask ) an, not entertain eye opening to me on subject! Our rain in My Heart over steps the line between subject and film-maker relationship and Watson... I see both sides of the casket he continues to film her given... Not only in the film its her name ) points at her head and say it is.. Wouldnt want ourselves to be in the film Heart must be a controversial documentray in of... The documentary there is a shot of him asking Why am I asking to. Dont think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive caring for an alcoholic personal questions as he to... His subject vomitted and had a hard time with pain where I felt Paul Watson a... But physically rain in my heart update mark well as mentally, when they were drunk, but generally throughout the film 49, been! Pioneer Paul Watson the documentary will help with your wording, font, font font. A state after they are drunk subject such as alcoholism without the use of year!, font color, paper shape options and choice of six paper.... Being the most possible respect in saying all this we must remember that the. A video called, Revisiting rain in My Heart Wall Art designed and sold by artists based on deadly... Point out how these subjects were all willing participants, however their capacity to give consent into! In, so the documentary will help to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct in! Comments KNWYRRTS says Overall, I dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within film. Also just to confirm Gillingham is a pretty shitty place to grow up,... Didnt expect rain in My Heart is a pretty shitty place to grow up,! To feel at certain points that stand out as being the most exploitative to make a documentary on alcoholism Kent...