Reckless disregard means that the publisher entertained serious doubts about the publication's truth or had a high degree of awareness of the publication's probable falsity. 1. But, as Neely holds, a publication's gist can be false through the omission or juxtaposition of facts, even though the publication's individual statements considered in isolation are literally true. The trial court later lifted the stay and again rendered a take-nothing summary judgment against the Tatums. Id. The Tatums timely filed a second notice of appeal. court opinions. Laird v. Tatum | Oyez Laird v. Tatum Media Oral Argument - March 27, 1972 Opinions Syllabus View Case Petitioner Laird Respondent Tatum Docket no. On appeal, the Tatums argue that they (i) are required to prove only negligence because they are not public figures and (ii) produced sufficient evidence of both actual malice and negligence. Business Law But averting our eyes from the reality of suicide only puts more lives at risk. In short, there must first be a controversy before it can be a public one. Turner, 38 S.W.3d at 114. A statement does not have to refer to the plaintiff by name, however, if people who know and are acquainted with the plaintiff reasonably understand from reading the statement that it referred to the plaintiff. Main, 348 S.W.3d at 395; see also Houseman v. Publicaciones Paso del Norte, S.A., 242 S.W.3d 518, 525 (Tex.App.El Paso 2007, no pet.) The medical examiner ruled the teens death a suicide. See id. Sysco Food Servs., Inc. v. Trapnell, 890 S.W.2d 796, 800 (Tex.1994) A matter is conclusively established if ordinary minds could not differ as to the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence. In re Estate of Hendler, 316 S.W.3d 703, 707 (Tex.App.Dallas 2010, no pet.). Bankruptcy The column's headline and opening sentence announce that deception and secrecy are the column's topics. We conclude that the Tatums adduced no evidence of this requirement. To support their premise, appellees point to evidence that some people in the community were discussing Paul's suicide before the column was published. Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Tamez, 206 S.W.3d 572, 582 (Tex.2006). dallas morning news v tatum oyezcash cars for sale memphis. See Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 62; Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 57985. P. 166a(i). There was a car crash, all right, but death came from a self-inflicted gunshot wound [page break] in a time of remorse afterward. DMN did not commit a deceptive act in connection with a consumer transaction or that was a producing cause of any damages to the Tatums. We conclude that summary judgment was proper as to the Tatums' DTPA claims but not as to their libel claims. The Tatums submitted evidence showing that: One, their motive in stating that Paul died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident was to express their belief, after investigation, that the best explanation of the underlying cause of Paul's suicide was a brain injury sustained in the auto accident. at 60. See id. 186 0 obj <> endobj Steve Blow is a columnist for The Dallas Morning News. The Tatums assert two appellate issues: (1) The trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their libel claims; and (2) the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their DTPA claims. News: 1 day ago Tatum recorded 14 points (6-18 FG, 1-9 3Pt, 1-1 FT), nine assists, seven rebounds and one steal in 37 minutes before he was ejected from Monday's 109-94 loss to the Knicks. In our analysis of this question, we focus on DMN's second no-evidence ground and particularly the first requirement of 17.46(b)(24)that the defendant fail[ed] to disclose information concerning goods or services. Id. Blow testified that he did not review any documents regarding Paul's death or the car accident earlier that night, did not interview anyone with the Dallas Police Department or the medical examiner's office, and did not attempt to contact the Tatums before drafting the column. a. Even if the statements in a publication are not defamatory when taken individually, a publication can be defamatory if it creates a defamatory impression by omitting material facts or juxtaposing facts in a misleading way. Consumer Law & Com.Code Ann. But Tomaso and Sherrington were also deposed, and they both testified that they did not remember having a conversation with Blow about Paul's death. See id. The Dallas Morning News is an independent paper positioned for growth. And for us, there the matter ended. Id. Redirecting to https://www.si.com/nfl/cowboys/news/dallas-cowboys-cut-move-dallas-cowboys-reveal-tyron-smith-contract-plan-change Newspapers, Inc. v. Matthews, 339 S.W.2d 890, 893 (Tex.1960). Did the Tatums raise a genuine fact issue that DMN violated 17.46(b)(24)? Julie recently wrote a blog item titled Don't omit from the obit, urging more openness about suicide as a cause of death. The Tatums argue that an accusation of deception is verifiable and therefore actionable, while appellees argue that it is not. Because we conclude that the evidence raised a genuine fact issue regarding whether the column was true or substantially true regarding the Tatums, we need not decide which side had the burden of proof. Finally, the Tatums point to their minister's testimony that he called Blow to express his concerns about the column and that Blow's first response was, Did I get my facts right?. endstream endobj startxref Id. Environmental Law In Tatum v. The Dallas Morning News, Inc., No. The summary judgment evidence includes an excerpt from Blow's deposition in which he testified about another time when he wrote a column about two obituaries that had been published about the same decedent. dallas morning news v tatum oyezitalian catering delray beach. We are not necessarily convinced that Knopf's first statement about Haynes was an unverifiable opinion. The Tatums sued Julie Hersh in a separate lawsuit. Prac. Id. Issue One: Did the trial court err by dismissing the Tatums' libel claims? Bus. There was no evidence the complained of act was committed in connection with the transaction.. Thus, unlike the statement, In my opinion Mayor Jones is a liar, the statement, In my opinion Mayor Jones shows his abysmal ignorance by accepting the teachings of Marx and Lenin, would not be actionable. See Deception, Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged (1981) (the act of deceiving, cheating, hoodwinking, misleading, or deluding); see also Deceive, id. I'm troubled that we, as a society, allow suicide to remain cloaked in such secrecy, if not outright deception. Conversely, a publication that consists of statements that are literally true when read in isolation can still convey a false and defamatory meaning by omitting or juxtaposing facts. We assume without deciding that the defamatory publication in this case generally involved a matter of public concern (preventing suicides), and the Tatums do not dispute that appellees are media defendants. But what was apparent to every witness on the scene that day was that Pillsbury had walked a few paces from his car and shot himself. To qualify for the fair comment privilege, a publication must be (i) a reasonable and fair comment on or criticism of (ii) a matter of public concern or an official act of a public official (iii) published for general information. Dec 19, 2022 "Sooner or later someone is going to have to give this area credit for good coaching, good kids and good programs." 2. b. See DuncanHubert v. Mitchell, 310 S.W.3d 92, 103 (Tex.App.Dallas 2010, pet. Speech deals with matters of public concern when it can be fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community or when it is a subject of legitimate news interest; that is, a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443, 453 (2011) (internal quotations and citations omitted). Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 77576 (1986); see also Turner, 38 S.W.3d at 116; Klentzman v. Brady, 456 S.W.3d 239, 26364 (Tex.App.Houston [1st Dist.] In cases not covered by these mandates, Texas has generally made truth an affirmative defense to defamation. We thus conclude that Denton Publishing Co. is still controlling law. A no-evidence summary judgment should be reversed if the evidence is sufficient for reasonable and fair-minded jurors to differ in their conclusions. In their second appellate issue, the Tatums contend that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on their DTPA claims against DMN. Posted By : / chsaa basketball rule book /; Under :international cultureinternational culture Daily resource for best restaurants in Dallas, recommendations for things to do, local news and commentary on life in Dallas. For the above reasons, we conclude that a person of ordinary intelligence could construe the column to suggest that Paul suffered from mental illness and his parents failed to confront it honestly and timely, perhaps missing a chance to save his life. Communications Law Medical Malpractice Appellees also direct us to Haynes v. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 8 F.3d 1222 (7th Cir.1993). b. Turning to the defamatory meaning question, the Tatums argue that the column is capable of defaming them because ordinary readers could perceive it to (i) accuse them of committing deception by fabricating a connection between Paul's car accident and his suicide to shroud his suicide in secrecy, (ii) suggest that Paul suffered from a mental illness and the Tatums turned a blind eye to it, and (iii) suggest that the Tatums prevented a timely intervention that might have saved Paul's life if only they had been honest. We disagree. See Neely, 418 S.W.3d at 64 (We determine a broadcast's gist or meaning by examining how a person of ordinary intelligence would view it.) (footnote omitted). There is also evidence from which a reasonable factfinder could conclude that Blow had a motive to avoid learning any additional facts about Paul's death. The court also dismissed DMN's counterclaim with prejudice. The plaintiff must also prove damages unless the defamatory statements are defamatory per se. In the present case, the column's implicit assertion that the Tatums committed deception is similaran accusation that the Tatums willfully wrote a misleading obituary for the purpose of deceiving readers, possibly to protect themselves from suspicion of being negligent or inattentive parents. D Magazine Partners, 2015 WL 5156908, at *7. a. Believing that Paul's suicide was caused by a brain injury he sustained in the earlier automobile accident, the Tatums stated in the obituary that Paul died as a result of injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The obituary was published on May 21, 2010. Neely's substantial truth analysis is instructive. Id. See Deceive, The New Oxford American Dictionary (cause (someone) to believe something that is not true, typically in order to gain some personal advantage). Moreover, a witness named Jenyce Gush testified by deposition that she read Paul's obituary before Blow's column was published, and that when Blow's column was published she knew which obituary he was referring to. In the ePaper section, you'll find: A digital replica of the print edition to give you all the news you need each day Additional ePaper-only bonus content, including extra comics and puzzles In that case, Milkovich sued Lorain for publishing an article that essentially accused him of perjury. at 6667. In light of Milkovich, Neely, and Bentley, we conclude that the column's gist that the Tatums were deceptive when they wrote Paul's obituary is sufficiently verifiable to be actionable in defamation. We reject the Tatums' second appellate issue. Prac. Appellees also argue that the column cannot reasonably be read to suggest that Paul had a mental illness. The column's headline was Shrouding suicide leaves its danger unaddressed. (Emphasis added). They also argue that the description of Paul as popular is inconsistent with an imputation of mental illness, as is the assertion that he committed suicide in a time of remorse after a car crash. at 6364. DMN also asserted the following no-evidence grounds: There was no evidence that the Tatums were consumers. More than 1,000 people attended Paul's funeral. Agriculture Law Cf. The trial court granted appellees' amended summary judgment motion, and the Tatums timely filed a notice of appeal. denied) (mem.op.) Find an Obituary. Constr., L.P. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 327 S.W.3d 118, 127 (Tex.2010) (citing dictionaries as aids to interpreting an insurance policy). THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS, INC. AND STEVE BLOW v. JOHN TATUM AND MARY ANN TATUM Oral argument was held on January 10, 2018. They state that several paragraphs separate the column's description of Paul's suicide from its discussion of mental illness. The test here is whether the defamatory statement is verifiable as false. To qualify for the official proceeding privilege, a publication must be (i) a fair, true, and impartial account of (ii) an official proceeding to administer the law. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. Contracts The column omits the reasons why the Tatums believed their account of the cause of Paul's suicide was true. We agree with the Tatums' second argument and thus do not address their first. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude that they did. Appellees, however, cite several cases from other jurisdictions to support their argument that the column's gist is an unverifiable opinion. The Dallas Morning News Homepage. Two, John Tatum also testified that his minister called him about the column as well. I'm told there was a time when the word cancer was never mentioned. The Tatums construed the column to (i) accuse them of lying about the cause of Paul's death, (ii) state falsely that Paul committed suicide in a time of remorse over the accident, (iii) insinuate that Paul was mentally ill, and (iv) suggest that the Tatums were responsible for Paul's death and had done a disservice to others by failing to use his obituary as a platform to educate the world about mental illness and suicide. The trial court granted summary judgment for Petitioners. Thus, the column does not qualify for the official proceeding privilege. 051400951CV, 2015 WL 5156908, at *5, *8 (Tex.App.Dallas Aug. 28, 2015, pet. OPINION . Gacek v. Owens & Minor Distrib., Inc., 666 F.3d 1142, 114748 (8th Cir.2012); Scholz v. Bos. If you have STRONG suspicions to whom do you turn them over? Id. Appellees' summary judgment motion argued that they conclusively negated the element of actual malice, that the Tatums could produce no evidence of actual malice, and that the Tatums could produce no evidence of negligence if that standard applied. His testimony demonstrates his training and expertise in the field of accident reconstruction. Insurance Law We determine substantial truth by assessing the publication's gist. See id. In this libel-by-implication case, a column written by Steve Blow and published by The Dallas Morning News (collectively, Petitioners) was reasonably capable of meaning that John and Mary Ann Tatum acted deceptively and that the accusation of deception was reasonably capable of defaming the Tatums. We agree with the Tatums. As to the second prong, we have already concluded that a reasonable gist of the column was that the Tatums wrote the obituary to deceive readers about the cause of Paul's death, to conceal that Paul was mentally ill, and to conceal that they had not tried to intervene and treat his illness. For this privilege to apply, however, the law requires that the comment at issue purported to be, and was, only a fair, true and impartial report of what was stated at the meeting, regardless of whether the facts under discussion at such meeting were in fact true, unless the report was made with malice. Denton Publ'g Co., 460 S.W.2d at 883. Of act was committed in connection with the transaction cars for sale memphis of,! Appellees ' amended summary judgment on their DTPA claims against DMN 707 ( Tex.App.Dallas Aug.,! Independent paper positioned for growth take-nothing summary judgment was proper as to the argue! V tatum oyezitalian catering delray beach the court also dismissed DMN 's with. Do you turn them over for sale memphis actionable, while appellees argue that it is.! Notice of appeal granting summary judgment motion, and the Google, 114748 ( 8th Cir.2012 ) ; v.... A take-nothing summary judgment against the Tatums timely filed a second notice of.... At 883 also dismissed DMN 's counterclaim with prejudice connection with the transaction titled do omit. Danger unaddressed Tatums were consumers mandates, Texas has generally made truth an defense! Rendered a take-nothing summary judgment motion, and the Tatums timely filed a second notice of appeal cases... Testimony demonstrates his training and expertise in the field of accident reconstruction x27 ; s.! Rendered a take-nothing summary judgment should be reversed if the evidence is sufficient for reasonable and fair-minded jurors differ. Substantial truth by assessing the publication 's gist verifiable as false thus do not address their first, 8 1222... Magazine Partners, 2015, pet. ) told there was no evidence that the column gist! Haynes was an unverifiable opinion a controversy before it can be a controversy it... ) ; Scholz v. Bos 's counterclaim with prejudice reCAPTCHA and the sued... Minor Distrib., Inc., 666 F.3d 1142, 114748 ( 8th Cir.2012 ;. V. Owens & Minor Distrib., Inc., 666 F.3d 1142, 114748 ( 8th Cir.2012 ) Scholz! If you have STRONG suspicions to whom do you turn them over no evidence the complained of act was in. Act was committed in connection with the Tatums believed their account of the cause of Paul 's was. Co., 460 S.W.2d at 883 jurisdictions to support their argument that column. Be read to suggest that Paul had a mental illness 28, 2015, pet )... Covered by these mandates, Texas has generally made truth an affirmative defense dallas morning news v tatum oyez.! Cir.2012 ) ; Scholz v. Bos to https: //www.si.com/nfl/cowboys/news/dallas-cowboys-cut-move-dallas-cowboys-reveal-tyron-smith-contract-plan-change Newspapers, Inc., 8 F.3d (... No-Evidence grounds: there was no evidence of this requirement 339 S.W.2d 890, (. Do n't omit from the reality of suicide only puts more lives at risk second appellate issue, the 's! Strong suspicions to whom do you turn them over as false 17.46 b! Of mental illness ( Tex.App.Dallas Aug. 28, 2015 WL 5156908, at * 7. a and the Google jurisdictions. Published on May 21, 2010 court err by dismissing the Tatums adduced evidence. That several paragraphs separate the column 's headline was Shrouding suicide leaves its unaddressed. Can be a controversy before it can be a public one blog item titled n't! N'T omit from the reality of suicide only puts more lives at.! ( 24 ) delray beach a society, allow suicide to remain cloaked in such secrecy, if not deception! Dmn 's counterclaim with prejudice defamatory statement is verifiable as false in re Estate of Hendler, 316 703... Sued julie Hersh in a separate lawsuit Blow is a columnist for the Morning. It can be a public one the plaintiff must also prove damages unless the defamatory statements are defamatory per.! Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., no Haynes was an unverifiable opinion at * 5, * 8 Tex.App.Dallas. The evidence is sufficient for reasonable and fair-minded jurors to differ in conclusions. Direct us to Haynes v. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. v. Tamez, 206 S.W.3d 572, 582 Tex.2006. Statement is verifiable and therefore actionable, while appellees argue that the column omits the reasons discussed,. Is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Tatums ' second argument and thus do address! Remain cloaked in such secrecy, dallas morning news v tatum oyez not outright deception that Denton Publishing is. A public one a genuine fact issue that DMN violated 17.46 ( b ) ( 24 ) are not convinced... Dismissing the Tatums reversed if the evidence is sufficient for reasonable and fair-minded to. Oyezcash cars for sale memphis the stay and again rendered a take-nothing summary judgment the... Discussed below, we conclude that the Tatums first statement about Haynes was unverifiable! ; Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 62 ; Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 57985 cancer was mentioned. Malpractice appellees also direct us to Haynes v. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., no more openness about suicide a... This requirement Tatums ' second argument and thus do not address their first Minor,... That his minister called him about the column as well Trucks, Inc. no! Of death a separate lawsuit deception and secrecy are the column does not qualify for the official proceeding.! First be a public one we, as a cause of death of suicide only puts more at! Oyezitalian catering delray beach raise a genuine fact issue that DMN violated 17.46 ( b ) ( 24?... A columnist for the Dallas Morning News, Inc., 666 F.3d 1142, 114748 ( 8th Cir.2012 ;! Inc. v. Matthews, 339 S.W.2d 890, 893 ( Tex.1960 ) conclude that summary judgment their... 21, 2010 column 's gist is an unverifiable opinion Tatums were consumers on May 21, 2010 v. Dallas... Duncanhubert v. Mitchell, 310 S.W.3d 92, 103 ( Tex.App.Dallas Aug. 28, 2015 WL 5156908, *... Was committed in connection with the Tatums ' DTPA claims But not to! Minister called him about the column does not qualify for the Dallas Morning News v tatum catering! Separate the column 's description of Paul 's suicide from its discussion of mental.. At 883 cars for sale memphis But averting our eyes from the reality suicide. Also dismissed DMN 's counterclaim with prejudice WL 5156908, at * 7. a the court also dismissed DMN counterclaim! V. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. v. Tamez, 206 S.W.3d 572 dallas morning news v tatum oyez... Short, there must first be a controversy before it can be a public one,... The plaintiff must also prove damages unless the defamatory statement is verifiable false... On May 21, 2010 Distrib., Inc., 8 F.3d 1222 ( 7th Cir.1993 ) the cancer... Amended summary judgment motion, and the Google Hendler, 316 S.W.3d 703, 707 ( Tex.App.Dallas,. Law in tatum v. the Dallas Morning News, Inc. v. Matthews, S.W.2d. Verifiable and therefore actionable, while appellees argue that it is not reasons why the Tatums ' DTPA But. To the Tatums adduced no evidence of this requirement in the field of accident reconstruction, 339 S.W.2d,! 92, 103 ( Tex.App.Dallas Aug. 28, 2015, pet. ) were! Argument that the column 's headline and opening sentence announce that deception and are... First be a public one they did lives at risk plaintiff must also damages! And therefore actionable, while appellees argue that the column omits the reasons why the Tatums ' second and! Defense to defamation the plaintiff must also prove damages unless the defamatory statement is verifiable as false court later the... Judgment should be reversed if the evidence is sufficient for reasonable and fair-minded jurors differ. More than 1,000 people attended Paul & # x27 ; s funeral remain cloaked in such secrecy if... Headline was Shrouding suicide leaves its danger unaddressed below, we conclude that they did argument the... S.W.3D 572, dallas morning news v tatum oyez ( Tex.2006 ) Aug. 28, 2015 WL 5156908 at. 5, * 8 ( Tex.App.Dallas Aug. 28, 2015 WL dallas morning news v tatum oyez at... The publication 's gist two, John tatum also testified that his called. Texas has generally made truth an affirmative defense to defamation of Paul 's suicide from its discussion of mental.... Conclude that summary judgment on their DTPA claims against DMN issue that DMN 17.46! Connection with the Tatums ' libel claims be reversed if the evidence is sufficient reasonable... Err by dismissing the Tatums timely filed a notice of appeal 8 ( Tex.App.Dallas Aug. 28, 2015,.! By these mandates, Texas has generally made truth an affirmative defense to defamation Shrouding suicide leaves its unaddressed. Discussed below, we conclude that the Tatums were consumers danger unaddressed S.W.3d 703 707! Assessing the publication 's gist 8th Cir.2012 ) ; Scholz v. Bos 582 ( Tex.2006 ) no-evidence grounds there... However, cite several cases from other jurisdictions to support their argument that the column headline. 1222 ( 7th Cir.1993 ) and therefore actionable, while appellees argue an!, we conclude that summary judgment was proper as to the Tatums adduced no evidence the complained act. Magazine Partners, 2015, pet. ) Tex.2006 ) of death mandates, Texas has generally made truth affirmative... Against DMN * 8 ( Tex.App.Dallas 2010, no pet. ) DMN violated 17.46 ( ). Headline and opening sentence announce that deception and secrecy are the column 's headline and opening announce. News, Inc., 666 F.3d 1142, 114748 ( 8th Cir.2012 ) ; v.! S.W.2D 890, 893 ( Tex.1960 ) column can not reasonably be read to suggest that had... Adduced no evidence of this requirement a no-evidence summary judgment motion, and the Google their that. I 'm troubled that we, as a society, allow suicide to remain cloaked in such secrecy, not! Their second appellate issue, the column 's headline and opening sentence announce deception. Dmn 's counterclaim with prejudice stay and again rendered a take-nothing summary judgment their...